Homeopathy and Modern Physics /A Working Hypothesis for Homeopathic Microdiluted Remedies

A Working Hypothesis for Homeopathic Microdiluted Remedies

Summary :

A three-step hypothesis to explain the specific organizaton of molecules of the solvent in homeopathic microdilutions which can maintain the properties of an initial substance not effectively present is herewith introduced, e.g. for the case of pharmaceutical substances that need grinding before their dilution. 

First: 
We assume that during grinding and the first seq uential dilutions characteristic small clusters (aggregates of a small number of molecules) of the diluted substance are fonned. They are surrounded by shells of organized hydrogen-bonded molecules of the solvent (called clathrates).

 Second: 
Because of the applied forceful succussions and the different inertial properties, small clusters move out of their clathrates. A new clathrate then forms around each relocated small cluster, and an additional clathrate (mantle clathrate) is formed round the initial clathrate (now called the core clathrate). which has become hollow, having lost its small cluster.

Third: 
At this state, no effective amount of substance is present. The role of small clusters in dilutions and succussions to follow is totally influenced by the compact structure of the core clathrate, which possesses an interior void, characteristic of the properties of the initial substance. That is, due to forcefully applied succussions and different inertial properties, core clathrates move out of their mantle clathrates and stimulate the formation of new mantle clathrates. Likewise, old mantle clathrates become new core clathrate and stimulate formation of their own mantle clathrates. As succussion and dilution continues, the process isrepeated.

Important parameters involved during the preparation of a homeopathic remedy arc 1) the applied force and its fixed direction in each succussion to separate small clusters from their clathrates or core clathrates from their mantle clathrate; 2) the time between two successive succussions to allow the rcorgani7ation of the molecules of the solvent to form new clathrates and 3) the number of successive dilutions necessary to reach the desired density and size of hollow clathrate s which resemble the properties of the initial substance.

Introduction remedy, which isthe subject matter of thepresent After many successes in specific cases, homeopathy has attracted a lot of attention and tends to become accepted fact [l]. A significant percentage of physicians in the USA and Europe consider themselves homeopaths. Despite this impressive number, however, even to date few medical professionals or consumers know anything about the structure of the homeopathic communication. The homeopathic pharmaceutical process called "potentialization" refers Lo a method of sequential dilutions and succussions (each time between two sequential dilutions the mixture is vigorously shaken a specific number of times, e.g.40times). Manyphysiologicalprocesses are certainly controlled, or affected, by minute quantities of substances. However, Lhis does not explain the action of potencies diluted far beyond the Avogadro's number, e.g. 1/10 100 (called microdilutions). Recently, researchers suggested that the therapeutic properties of the remedy in the latter case lies in the solvent [2) rather than in the diluted substance.

Various technique s have been employed to demonstrate that there arc physical differences between potentized dilutions and the solvent itself. These studies have included the use of ultraviolet spectra, conductivity measurements and infrared analysis, surface tension measurement, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and other methods (3-9].

Several theoretical attempts to explain the unusual behavior of microdilutions suggest certain organization [2,11] of the water molecules (polymerization of the solvent). However, there is no convincin g explanation for the specific organization of solvents which is able to main lain in these dilutions some properties of the initial substance, which is no longer effectively present. The purpose of this work is to contribute to an understanding of microdilutions by using some principles of physics. Specif1cal\y, we introduce the following three-step hypothesis.

Step One We assume that during grinding and the first stages of dilution small clusters [11-14] of the substance are formed(i.e.aggregateswith asmall number of molecules). As known from physics, these clusterspossesspropertiesdistinctly differentfrom the bulk properties of the substance as a resultof differencesin equilibriumgeometry and electronic structure.Thegrindingofalkalimetals used in homeopathy and their further dilution into solvent may cause the formation of small clusters, which thereafter exhibitsubstantial stability and possess the characteristic shape of the specificsubstance,withhighlysymmetricalfonns [15-17]. Up to this stage, the succussions used in homeopathy play no role. For better understanding of oof our three-step hypothesis, we take,incombination with Figures 1-3, the example where the substance on which the remedy of interest is based issodium, and the smallclustersformedarecomposed of,letussay, 40 molecules (atoms). According to Reference 16, each small cluster of Na 40 is made up of sequential concentric shells of 2, 6, 12 and 20 atoms (see Fig. 2 of Ref. 16). Specifically, the outside shell is a dodecahedron, as shown in Figure la.
Molecules of the solvent (water)surrounding each of the small clusters now form bonds with one another (e.g. hydrogen bonds) [18), giving rise to a shell with a shape similar to that of the small cluster, having the small cluster as its core. That is,thesewater moleculesform what iscalled a clathrate [19] structure which, in itself, is a small cluster of water molecules. Figure 1b shows the clathrate around the dodecahedron of Figure la, which again has a pentagonal dodecahedron structure and whose site is restricted (at this stage) by the size of the small cluster rather than by the strength of hydrogen bonding. As a result of this restriction, we have a loose clathrate. In Figure 2a the small cluster (A) and the clathrate (B) arc shown together in schematic fo1m inside the unperturbed water (D). Between layers (B) and (D) of this figure and the figures to follow, an incompatibility layer (C) of semi organized water molecules is seen. In general, the situation shown in Figure 2a presents the solute solvent system in a rather early stage of remedy preparation.
Step Two If the subsequent succussions arc forceful enough, small clusters with an inertial behavior different from the surrounding loose clathratcs overpass the cohesion forces and move to other positions(Figure 2c) outside thcir clathrate shells along the direction of the external force. At each new position for each small cluster, a new loose clathrate is formed (Fig. 2c). Immediately after each small-cluster relocation the corresponding clathrate shell ofthewater molecules is partially broken (Fig.2b).However, neighbor molecules of the solvent (water) try to fill the empty space inside the broken clathrate in competition with the shell trying to repair itself (helped by itshigh symmetry [19])to its previous form where the small cluster was ils core. Because of this competition, some clathrate shells structure than in Figure 2a. Another mantle clathrate is now formed outside this core clathratc, i.e.,the semi organized molecules in the Clayer of Figure 2a and b become organized in the form of a clathrate whose size now depends on the size of the core clathrate and not on the strength of the hydrogen bond alone (Figure 2d). The form of this mantle clathrate is not necessarily the same as that of the core clathrate.
StepThree Now let us assume thatwehave a solution with empty clathrates (holes), but having not even one molecule of the initial substance (see Fig. 3a identical to Fig. 2d). In this solution we apply forceful succussions.The role of small clusters of substance is now taken on by the empty clathratcs of water molecules. Their symmetric and compact structure givesthem extra stability and, thus, they behave like large complex olecu les, i.e., molecules with a much  larger mass and, so, with different inertial properties than regular water molecules or accidental formations of water molecules. Specifically, during these succussionsthe core clathrate moves into another position outside the mantle clathrate (Fig. 3c), leaving an empty space at its initial position. Then the story repeats itself as in the second step, that is, by repairing and shrinking the broken mantle clathrate, which finally becomes a compact core clathratc surrounded by a newly formed, loose mantle clathrate. These new core and mantle clathrates arc not necessarily identical to the core and mantle clathratesin StepTwo.The finalstage of this procedure leads to Figure 3d, which resembles, but it is not necessarily identical to Figures 3aand 2d. At the same time, the relocated core clathrate of Figure 3c acquires a new mantle clathratc, i.e., Figure 3c is transformed into Figure 3e,which isidentical to Figures 3a and 2d. As the succussions continue, more and more shaped holes arc created in the solvent. Their form and size depend on that of the small clusters of the initial substance, which is actually absent. A sufficient time interval must exist between two sequential succussions in order to allow all necessary orientations and organizations of water molecules involved during our steps 1-3 to take place.In a brief review of our three-step procedure, we notice that the important parametersinvolved are (1) the guarantee that small clusters of the diluted substance arc formed, (2) the force applied to each succussion which should be able to compensate for the cohesion between a small cluster and a clathrate or between a core clathrate and a mantle clathrale, (3) the direction of the force, which should stay fixed (one-way) for all succussions so that each succussion does not destroy the effects of the previous ones, (4) the number of succussions per dilution inrelation to the strength of the applied forceand to thedimensions of the vessel used during potentialization, (5) the frequency of succussions, whereby the time between two successive succussions must be large enough to permit the formation of the necessary mantle clathrates around the small clusters of the substance or around thecore clathrates, and (6) the number of sequential dilutions necessary in order to reach the desired density (and size) of holes in the solvent and, thus, in the remedy.
If our solute (substance) were a noble gas instead of the alkali atom (e.g. sodium) assumed previously, the structure (and to some extent the size) of the small cluster and thus of the related clathrates wou ld be different than the one discussed. That is, the surface structure of the relevant small cluster would not be that of Figure la, but the icosahed ral structure shown in Figure 1of Reference 16. If, as another example, our substance were a mixture of alkali metals, then the geometry of related clusters would follow that of Figure l of Reference 17.Thus, we see that some of th e properties of the initial substance can be traced by the properties of the shaped holes in the solvent. Inother words, the specific homeopathic remedy resultig from microdilutions of a certain substance may have some characteristic properties of that substance, although it is not physically present, a fact which constitutes the foundations of homeopathy.
While the organization of water molecules in shells around a central molecule (up to three layers per central molecule) or the formation of holes in water are well-known phenome n a in the science of Physical Chemistry [20-22), the introduction of the small cluster concept is necessary to explain the symmetrical organization of water molecules (clathrates) and consequently the formation of shaped holes in the solvent exhibiting stable symmetrical forms characteristic of the initial substance. InPhysical Chemistry wc speak about holes and shells in general. Here, wc speak of holes and shell s with specific shapes and properties which constitute the basis of homeopat hic remedies. For such remedies, the initial physical presence of a substance as well as the formation of small clusters of that substance during grinding and at the early stages of the sequential microdilutions are essential. 
The next stage in our effort to explain the mechanism wit h which potentialization affects the homeopathic remedy is the performance of suitable experiments to verify all steps of our hypothesis. Finally, if our hypothesis is proved to be correct, it will contribute a great deal towards obtaining better homeopathic remedies and towards standardization of their preparation. As a result, all remedies derived from a certain substance and prepared using the same kind of potentialization would have more or less fixed properties. At present, lack of standardization is the major defect of our remedies. In order to achieve st andardization, the optimum force and its frequency should be established for any particular case. The necessary number of succussions for each dilution and the total number of dilutions to obtain the desired properties of the specific homeopathic remedy should also be determined. We hope that work presented herewillstimulatefurtherexperimenral and theoreticalresearch on the subject and will thusshed some light on a hot subject of alternative medicine in which the hopes of millions of people in the world are rested. This work constitutes one of the first objective scientificanemptsfocussedonthe theoretical basis of the science of homeopathy.

Comments